White paperThe Enterprise Framework for Compliant, Scalable AI
Download now
Continuous complianceDataRegulations

Quality System Upgrade to Meet EU MDR and EU IVDR

Case study on Quality System Upgrade to Meet EU MDR and EU IVDR.

Client profile: Large medical device manufacturer selling products across multiple countries, with a quality management system and 400 SOPs requiring review to meet EU MDR recertification requirements.

Quality System Upgrade to Meet EU MDR and EU IVDR graphic

Executive takeaway

USDM rebuilt the manufacturer's quality system to meet EU MDR in under 8 months — revising 400 SOPs, generating CND codes for EUDAMED, and reducing $3B in EU revenue risk.

Timeline

< 8 months

to establish a Quality System that meets EU MDR requirements

Revenue Risk Reduced

$3B

in revenue risk reduction across the EU through timely MDR recertification

SOPs Revised

400

policies and procedures inventoried, reviewed, and redlined for EU MDR impact

Before USDM

  • 400 SOPs and the QMS required review and revision to meet EU MDR recertification requirements
  • No CND codes in place for the required EUDAMED submissions
  • Uncertainty over how to plan for recalls by item, with $3B in EU revenue exposed

After USDM

  • Quality System established to meet EU MDR requirements in under 8 months
  • CND codes generated and data ready to submit to the European Database on Medical Devices (EUDAMED)
  • $3B in EU revenue risk reduced, with a clear recall-by-item plan and recertification path

A large medical device manufacturer selling products across multiple countries needed to upgrade its Quality System to meet the EU Medical Device Regulation (EU MDR). USDM Life Sciences helped the company revise 400 SOPs, generate CND codes for EUDAMED submissions, and put a clear plan in place for recall items — establishing a compliant quality system in under 8 months and reducing $3B in EU revenue risk.

The Challenge

Every existing device had to be recertified under EU MDR. That meant re-certification of the notified bodies, new submission requirements including new clinical evidence and reasoning (CER) forms, new post-marketing safety analysis and reporting requirements, and changes to the device technical files and dossiers.

For a manufacturer with products in multiple countries, the stakes were high. The company faced several converging pressures:

  • Its QMS and 400 SOPs required review and revision to align with EU MDR.
  • CND codes for EUDAMED submission had not yet been generated.
  • There was no clear plan for how to handle recalls by item.
  • An estimated $3B in EU revenue was at risk if recertification slipped.

This is fundamentally a quality and data integrity challenge: hundreds of controlled documents had to be reviewed, redlined, and resubmitted accurately and on a tight timeline, with no margin for error.

The USDM Approach

USDM met with the company's lead regulatory and quality executives to review the process and sequence of activities, then worked methodically through the document landscape:

  • Inventoried all policies and procedures affected by EU MDR and reviewed every necessary document.
  • Reviewed the remaining policies and procedures to confirm they were not relevant to the EU MDR initiative — scoping the work precisely so effort went where it mattered.
  • Assigned select regulatory consultants, matched by skill set and experience, to review and redline policies and procedures in their respective areas of expertise.
  • Reviewed all proposed revisions with the relevant regulatory and quality managers.
  • Provided hands-on support for the SOP submission processes required for device recertification.

Because the work spanned controlled documents, electronic submissions, and recertification records, USDM applied a quality-by-design and risk-based assurance mindset throughout, keeping document control and traceability intact across all 400 SOPs. For organizations that want to keep that posture beyond a single project, USDM's continuous compliance model sustains quality system readiness as regulations evolve.

The Results

USDM delivered a quality system rebuilt for EU MDR with measurable outcomes:

  • < 8 month timeline to establish a Quality System that meets EU MDR requirements.
  • $3B in revenue risk reduction across the EU.
  • Data ready to submit to the European Database on Medical Devices (EUDAMED), with CND codes generated and a recall-by-item plan in place.

By scoping the work precisely, matching the right consultants to each document area, and supporting the recertification submissions end to end, USDM turned a sprawling regulatory obligation into an on-time, audit-ready quality system — protecting billions in EU revenue and clearing the path to EUDAMED. Talk to USDM about your EU MDR or IVDR readiness.

EU MDR & IVDR Readiness

Facing EU MDR or IVDR recertification?

USDM helps medical device manufacturers revise SOPs, generate CND codes, and prepare EUDAMED submissions on aggressive timelines. Let's build your compliant quality system before the deadline.

Talk to a compliance expert

Go deeper

Related guidance

Blogs, webinars, and white papers on the capabilities behind this outcome.

Blog

Workforce Optimization: Maximizing Employee Efficiency and Productivity

Workforce optimization puts the right people on the right tasks at the right time. Explore data-driven strategies and delivery models that boost efficiency, productivity, and compliance in life sciences.

Read
White Paper

Anticipating Regulatory Compliance for Artificial Intelligence in Life Sciences

A practical white paper for Quality, Regulatory, IT, and Data leaders on governing, validating, and monitoring AI in GxP workflows ahead of FDA and global regulatory expectations.

Read
Webinar

USDM Life Sciences Summit 2025

Watch the USDM Life Sciences Summit 2025 on demand — four expert panels on data integrity, intelligent automation, AI use cases, and strategic technology alliances that turn data into a compliant advantage for regulated life sciences organizations.

Read
Blog

Caution about FDA’s Most Recent UDI "Enforcement Discretion" Guidance

FDA’s UDI enforcement discretion guidance does not change the compliance date — and it excludes implants and life-supporting/life-sustaining devices. Learn which class I, unclassified, and not-classified device types must still be fully UDI compliant.

Read
Blog

Continued Confusion and Misinformation about UDI Implementations

UDI requirements for the US and EU are similar but not identical, and confusion persists. Learn the dual purpose of Unique Device Identification, the EU MDR UDI deadlines that have not changed, and how to build a scalable, compliant UDI program.

Read
Blog

Critical vs. Non-Critical GxP Applications

Learn how to classify critical vs. non-critical GxP applications, sequence a risk-based cloud migration, and maintain validation quality and business continuity throughout the transition.

Read

Start here

Put AI to work in life sciences — with the right guardrails underneath.

Start with a structured AI Readiness Assessment: fixed-fee, executive-ready, and built to surface the highest-value workflows first.

Start here

Talk to USDM

Tell us what workflow or outcome you want to improve and we'll map the right AI, governance, and delivery path.

By submitting this form, you agree to USDM’s Privacy Policy and consent to receive communications from USDM. You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails.