White paperThe Enterprise Framework for Compliant, Scalable AI
Download now

An Update on the FDA’s UDI and GUDID Compliance Requirements

On-demand webinar with Jay Crowley on the FDA’s tightening UDI and GUDID requirements — closing Legacy Identifier gaps, UDI in routine inspections and import screening, and how labelers can align GUDID data across FDA systems before enforcement reaches them.

An Update on the FDA’s UDI and GUDID Compliance Requirements
Webinar

Watch this webinar

On-demand webinar with Jay Crowley on the FDA’s tightening UDI and GUDID requirements — closing Legacy Identifier gaps, UDI in routine inspections and import screening, and how labelers can align GUDID data across FDA systems before enforcement reaches them.

Fill out the short form to receive the requested content.

We only use your details to deliver this recording and follow up on your request. No newsletter detour. Unsubscribe anytime.

Agree to Privacy Policy and Email Opt-In *

By submitting this form, you agree to USDM’s Privacy Policy and consent to receive communications from USDM. You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails.

On-Demand Webinar | UDI & GUDID Update with Jay Crowley

Fill out the form to access the video replay >>>

Why the FDA Is Tightening UDI and GUDID Compliance

As we near the 10th anniversary of the publication of the FDA’s UDI System regulation, the FDA is taking several steps to close existing gaps and improve the utility of UDI and the accuracy of the data in GUDID. Specifically, as of 24 September 2024, FDA is closing the gaps between the use of Legacy Identifiers (NDC/NHRIC) and the UPC alternatives (full UDI required on class II or III OTC devices). More importantly, the FDA has made UDI part of routine inspections and import label screening.

What Labelers Must Ensure

This requires labelers to ensure the following.

  • The data submitted in MedWatch forms (section D) and in recall notices matches the data in GUDID.
  • The GMDN codes in GUDID are active (not obsolete) – even for commercially end-dated devices.
  • Devices that are no longer commercially distributed are properly end-dated.
  • The data elements critical for adoption are populated and accurate for all your DI records – including catalog number, full customer contact information, and an accurate and complete device description.

Ultimately, the FDA wants the data about a device to be consistent. The data submitted to GUDID matches the data in other FDA systems (e.g., premarket submission, registration, and listing). You will hear – or maybe you already have heard – from the FDA if there is data inconsistency. The data must align across all systems. Now is the time to get ahead of the FDA’s UDI compliance activities.

This on-demand webinar provides an update on the FDA’s requirements and notification activities and aims to answer many of the incoming questions our UDI consultants have received recently.

What You’ll Learn

  • How the FDA is closing the gaps between Legacy Identifiers (NDC/NHRIC) and UPC alternatives, and where full UDI is now required on class II or III OTC devices.
  • What it means now that UDI is part of routine inspections and import label screening.
  • Which GUDID data elements must match across MedWatch forms, recall notices, and other FDA systems — and where labelers most often fall out of alignment.
  • How to handle GMDN codes, end-dating, and the DI record elements critical for adoption.
  • Answers to the questions USDM’s UDI consultants have been hearing most often from device labelers.

UDI and GUDID compliance is no longer a one-time submission exercise — it’s an ongoing data-integrity obligation. When the same device is described inconsistently across GUDID, premarket submissions, registration, and listing, the FDA notices, and now it’s checking during routine inspections and at the border. USDM’s view is that getting ahead of this means treating device data the way you’d treat any regulated record: complete, accurate, current, and consistent across every system. Strong data integrity in life sciences practices are what keep UDI submissions audit-ready instead of reactive.

Presenters

FAQ: FDA UDI and GUDID Compliance

What changed on 24 September 2024?

The FDA closed the gaps between the use of Legacy Identifiers (NDC/NHRIC) and the UPC alternatives, requiring full UDI on class II or III OTC devices. The webinar walks through what this transition means for labelers in practice.

Is UDI now part of FDA inspections?

Yes. The FDA has made UDI part of routine inspections and import label screening, so UDI and GUDID accuracy is checked alongside other compliance activities rather than treated as a separate, one-time submission.

What does the FDA expect from my GUDID data?

The FDA wants device data to be consistent: the data submitted to GUDID should match the data in other FDA systems such as premarket submission, registration, and listing — as well as MedWatch forms (section D) and recall notices. Inconsistencies can trigger FDA notification.

What should labelers do about devices no longer in distribution?

Devices that are no longer commercially distributed should be properly end-dated, and GMDN codes in GUDID should remain active (not obsolete) even for commercially end-dated devices, per the requirements covered in the session.

How do I get ahead of FDA UDI enforcement?

Start by making sure the data elements critical for adoption — catalog number, full customer contact information, and an accurate, complete device description — are populated and accurate across all your DI records, and that everything aligns across FDA systems. A continuous compliance approach helps keep that data aligned over time rather than scrambling at inspection. If you’d like help, contact USDM.

Watch the on-demand webinar. Fill out the form above to access the video replay and hear Jay Crowley’s full update on the FDA’s UDI and GUDID requirements. To talk through your own UDI and GUDID readiness with USDM’s consultants, contact our team.

Request the webinar

Fill out the short form above to request the content. We will email it to you after submission.

Explore capabilities

Find the USDM practice area most relevant to this topic.

Platform partners

See how USDM delivers outcomes on the platforms you use.

Related resources

Keep exploring

Hand-picked blogs, case studies, and guides on the same topic.

Continuous complianceData

FDA Mandated Global CSV Remediation

Global medical device company with $7.5B in annual revenue and more than 100,000 products commercially available, operating enterprise and business-unit GxP systems across cloud, in-house, LMS, ERP, lab, manufacturing, and clinical environments.

Case study on FDA Mandated Global CSV Remediation.

Scope Reduced

Over 80%

See proof
Blog

Workforce Optimization: Maximizing Employee Efficiency and Productivity

Workforce optimization puts the right people on the right tasks at the right time. Explore data-driven strategies and delivery models that boost efficiency, productivity, and compliance in life sciences.

Read
GovernanceContinuous compliance

Box Meets Complex Security and Global GxP Validation Requirements

Global biosciences company founded in China with U.S. locations, developing infectious disease treatments (including COVID-19) and in Stage II clinical trials, with limited in-house computer system validation and GxP regulatory experience.

Discover how USDM enabled FDA-ready Box GxP validation for a global biosciences company, meeting tight deadlines and complex security requirements.

Global CSV Outcome

Defensible

See proof
Blog

Layer 0-5: A Life Sciences Operating Model for Claude Adoption

A six-layer operating model for adopting Claude in regulated life sciences — from intended use and governed context through connectors, skills, agents, and evidence-based governance. Start with structure, not demos.

Read
Webinar

UDI Beyond Borders

Watch the on-demand 12th annual UDI Conference, moderated by Jay Crowley — the original developer of the FDA's UDI requirements — for a global look at FDA, EU MDR/IVDR, and emerging international Unique Device Identification rules, plus the data quality and data management practices device manufacturers need to comply.

Read